[ forgot to answer this part ] Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Another question here is whether we should just fix this in CVS HEAD, > or whether there's any reason to back-patch it.
Agreed, fixing it in HEAD seems sufficient. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers