Hi, Kevin Grittner írta: > Marc Cousin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> This time, it's this case that doesn't work : >> > > >> I really feel that the timeout framework is the way to go here. >> > > Since Zoltán also seems to feel this way: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > > I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request > that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF. Does anyone > feel this approach (without the framework) should be pursued > further? >
I certainly think so, the current scheme seems to be very fragile and doesn't want to be extended. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
