Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> wrote: > Kevin Grittner írta: >> I wonder whether this patch shouldn't be rejected with a request >> that the timeout framework be submitted to the next CF. Does >> anyone feel this approach (without the framework) should be >> pursued further? > > I certainly think so, the current scheme seems to be very fragile > and doesn't want to be extended. Sorry, I phrased that question in a rather confusing way; I'm not sure, but it sounds like you're in favor of dropping this approach and pursuing the timeout framework in the next CF -- is that right? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
