On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 09:44 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Here's an updated patch, with the invalidation changes merged in and > > > hopefully-suitable adjustments elsewhere. > > > > I haven't tested this patch, but I read through it (and have I mentioned > > how unbelievably illegible -u format patches are?). > > I have every confidence that you, of all people, can arrange to use > 'filterdiff --format=context' on attached patches automatically, > saving you some time and us some boredom :)
I was under the impression that the project guideline was that we only accepted context diffs? Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
