Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > If BSON is simply in effect an efficient encoding of JSON, then it's not > clear to me that we would want another type at all. Rather, we might > want to consider storing the data in this supposedly more efficient > format, and maybe also some conversion routines.
Hmm, that's an interesting plan ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers