Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> If BSON is simply in effect an efficient encoding of JSON, then it's not 
> clear to me that we would want another type at all. Rather, we might 
> want to consider storing the data in this supposedly more efficient 
> format, and maybe also some conversion routines.

Hmm, that's an interesting plan ...

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to