"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Charles Pritchard <ch...@jumis.com> wrote: >> Storing internally as BSON (if it holds up to its premise) would >> mean more efficient traversal of internal objects in the future, >> if we were to have JSON-related functions/selectors. > How about the fact that not all JSON objects can be represented in > BSON (if the JSON object has a very long string), and not all BSON > objects can be represented in JSON (if the BSON object has an > array).
Well, if it's not just a binary encoding of JSON, I think we can forget about it ... certainly it won't work in the form I was visualizing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers