"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Charles Pritchard <ch...@jumis.com> wrote:
>> Storing internally as BSON (if it holds up to its premise) would
>> mean more efficient traversal of internal objects in the future,
>> if we were to have JSON-related functions/selectors.
> How about the fact that not all JSON objects can be represented in
> BSON (if the JSON object has a very long string), and not all BSON
> objects can be represented in JSON (if the BSON object has an
> array).
Well, if it's not just a binary encoding of JSON, I think we can forget
about it ... certainly it won't work in the form I was visualizing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
