Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 18:48, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, try this. ?It takes about 14 seconds on my machine on my copy of > >> Magnus's test repository. ?Output looks like this: > > > > 14 seconds! ?That sound much too slow :-) > > /me is very sorry master. Please beat your unworthy servant only > lightly... or alternatively, buy me a faster machine. > > It should get a bit faster if we reduce the number of branches it > examines, which I assume is something we can do once we desupport 7.4 > and 8.0. We could also add a --since argument which would doubtless > speed things up a lot, by truncating the history to, say, the last N
Yes, I will definately need a --since argument like cvs log -d which restricts by date. I usually find the data of the previous release and use that to pull cvs logs to create the release notes. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
