On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:21, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:17, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> /me is very sorry master. Please beat your unworthy servant only >>>> lightly... or alternatively, buy me a faster machine. >>> >>> Well, I might be able to afford a beer. >> >> Done! > > Well on 2nd thought, maybe not... If people start collecting I'll be > broke (notably I owe tom quite a few :-).
Cheapskate. > Anyway find below version that passes any arguments through to git-log. Yeah, I don't think I want to go that route. Arbitrary user-specified arguments to git-log might not be (probably aren't) sane in this context, and there's also a chance that might want to have arguments that are handled internally by the script, rather than passed through. But I do agree that passing --since through is sensible. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
