On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > The new git repository will have different SHA1s for all of the commits, > so any old SHA1s will be useless without the old repository. > > Hopefully nobody used links to specific commits (or SHA1s) pointing to > the old git repository for anything important. But I found myself doing > so occasionally for unimportant things (if it was important, I included > the date as a safeguard) -- so I assume a few other people did, as well. > > Would it be worth keeping the old git repository around in a read-only > mode, just in case people have links/SHA1s floating around for it?
Perhaps "http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-before-official-git-migration.git;a=summary"; -- http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
