On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 23:30 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It might well be, and the cost is low. But if you're talking about
> gitweb links or so, they'll still be invalid, because it would have to
> be renamed to "postgresql-old" or something like that...

Sure, that's fine.

It would just be nice to have a place to turn to if you have an old SHA1
and no other information; even if it's slightly inconvenient.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to