On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Max Bowsher <m...@f2s.com> writes: >> On 20/08/10 21:08, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I'm still confused as to why this results in such massive weirdness in >>> the generated git history, though. If it simply caused an extra commit >>> that adds the new file slightly earlier than the commit we think of as >>> adding the file, I wouldn't be complaining. > >> Isn't this what's happening? > > Uh, no, the excitement is about this: > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-migration.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/REL8_3_10 > > There are a whole lot of commits listed there that have nothing to do > with anything that ever happened on the 8.3 branch.
Tom, The problem you are looking at here has been fixed. We are looking at a different problem now. See: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=git-migration-test.git;a=summary -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
