On sön, 2010-08-22 at 15:08 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote: > > I think there are perfectly good reasons to have different permissions > > on parent and child tables. I don't see any reason to monkey around > > with that. > > Even though the permissions on the child table aren't invovled at all if > queried through the parent..? The parent implicitly adds to the set of > privileges which are granted on the child, but that's not clear at all > from the permissions visible on the child. That's principally what I'm > complaining about here.
Perhaps this is a user interface issue then. Maybe the fact that a table is inherited from another one needs to be shown closer to whereever the permissions are listed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers