2010/8/25 KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>: >>>>> 7. I think we need to write and include in the fine documentation some >>>>> "big picture" documentation about enhanced security providers. Of >>>>> course, we have to decide what we want to say. But the SECURITY LABEL >>>>> documentation is just kind of hanging out there in space right now; it >>>>> needs to connect to a broad introduction to the subject. >>>>> >>>> OK, I'll try to describe with appropriate granularity. >>>> Do we need an independent section in addition to the introduction of >>>> SECURITY LABEL syntax? >>> >>> I think so. I suggest a new chapter called "Enhanced Security >>> Providers" just after "Database Roles and Privileges". >>> >> OK, >> > > Now I'm under describing the new chapter. > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kaigai/sepgsql.git;a=blob;f=doc/src/sgml/esp.sgml;hb=devel/seclabel > > However, I'm wondering whether the topic about security hooks and some > others are appropriate for the "III. Server Administration" part. > > Perhaps, it is a good idea a new section at the last of "Database Roles > and Privileges" which introduce a fact that PostgreSQL allows plugins > to make access control decision, and a new chapter in the "VII. Internals" > part. > > How about the idea?
Well, I prefer what I suggested, but of course I'm biased. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
