On 24/08/10 04:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun ago 23 19:44:02 -0400 2010:
Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
[ "latch" proposal ]
This seems reasonably clean as far as signal conditions generated
internally to Postgres go, but I remain unclear on how it helps for
response to actual signals.
This could probably replace the signalling between postmaster and
autovac launcher, as well.
Hmm, postmaster needs to stay out of shared memory..
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
