Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> [ shrug... ] I stated before that the Hot Standby patch is doing >>> utterly unsafe things in signal handlers. Simon rejected that. >>> I am waiting for irrefutable evidence to emerge from the field >>> (and am very confident that it will be forthcoming...) [...] > >> [...]Why are >> we releasing 9.0 with this problem again? Surely this is nuts.
Will the docs give enough info so that release note readers will know when they're giving well-informed consent to volunteer to produce such field evidence? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
