On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ron Mayer <rm...@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> [ shrug... ] I stated before that the Hot Standby patch is doing >>>> utterly unsafe things in signal handlers. Simon rejected that. >>>> I am waiting for irrefutable evidence to emerge from the field >>>> (and am very confident that it will be forthcoming...) [...] >> >>> [...]Why are >>> we releasing 9.0 with this problem again? Surely this is nuts. > > Will the docs give enough info so that release note readers > will know when they're giving well-informed consent to volunteer > to produce such field evidence?
Yeah, exactly. Good news: you can now run queries on the standby. Bad news: we've abandoned our policy of not releasing with known bugs. Have fun and enjoy using PostgreSQL, the world's most advanced open source databSegmentation fault -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
