Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The above scenario is only a risk if you suppose that dropping a
>> relation that lacks physical storage will nonetheless result in
>> attempted unlink()s. I think that that's probably not the case;
> Why? How would we know that it didn't have physical storage prior to
> attempting the unlinks?
>From the relkind.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
