On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Did you extract this from his work, or is this completely independent? >> I'm a bit disinclined to say we should just toss overboard all the >> work that's already been done. Why did you write a new patch? > > I read his patch and am inspired by the work, but the code is almost > rewritten. As my previous comment, > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg01773.php > I think it's not a good idea to develop JSON datatype based on the > complex node links. The point of my patch is to simplify it. > > I'd like to encourage use of the simplified structure to implement > his other works, including JSONPath.
I think that if we make a habit of rewriting the contributions of first-time contributors in toto, we will have fewer second-time contributors. I think it would have been a good idea to discuss this on the list before you went and did it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
