On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Since we have PGDLLEXPORT in 9.0, we can mark some of exported >>> functions with it in tutorial codes and maybe contrib modules. >> >> If that (a) works and (b) reduces user confusion, +1 from me. We've >> gotten this question a few times lately. > > If we do so, many PGDLLEXPORT will be added: > * 17 in src/tutorial > * 507 in contrib > for each exported PGFunction, _PG_init, and _PG_fini. > > Any objections? Am I missing something?
Oh - I didn't realize this meant marking lots of things in contrib that didn't otherwise need to be marked. Why do other people need this if we don't? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
