On Oct 3, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It's not at all apparent that the code is even > safe as-is, because it's depending on the unstated assumption that that > static variable will get reset once per dictionary. The documentation > is horrible: it doesn't really explain what the patch is doing, and what > it does say is wrong.
Yep. We certainly would need to convince ourselves that this is correct before applying it, and that is all kinds of non-obvious. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
