On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > >>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a > >>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C > >>> || D). > >> Good point.
Asking for quorum_commit = 3 would cover that requirement. Not exactly as requested, but in a way that is both simpler to express and requires no changes to configuration after failover. ISTM better to have a single parameter than 5 separate configuration files, with behaviour that the community would not easily be able to validate. > If this is the only feature which standby registration is needed for, > has anyone written the code for it yet? Is anyone planning to? (Not me) > If not, it seems like standby registration is not *required* for 9.1. I > still tend to think it would be nice to have from a DBA perspective, but > we should separate required from "nice to have". Agreed. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
