On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:45 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> >>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a >> >>> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C >> >>> || D). >> >> Good point. > > Asking for quorum_commit = 3 would cover that requirement. > > Not exactly as requested, but in a way that is both simpler to express > and requires no changes to configuration after failover. ISTM better to > have a single parameter than 5 separate configuration files, with > behaviour that the community would not easily be able to validate.
That's just not the same thing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
