On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Proposed doc patch attached.
>
> Looks accurate to me.  I like the additional linking to the Reliability page
> you put in there too.  Heavily referencing that important page from related
> areas is a good thing, particularly now that it's got a lot more details
> than it used to.

Cool, thanks for the fast review.  I suspect there are more details
that could stand to be added to the WAL reliability page as well, but
I don't know what they are so I can't add them.

I still have the feeling that we have not put quite a large enough
red, blinking light around this issue, but I don't have a concrete
suggestion.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to