On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> It seems like it would be more helpful if you were working on >> implementing a design that had more than one vote. As far as I can >> tell, we have rough consensus that for the first commit we should only >> worry about the case where k = 1; that is, only one ACK is ever >> required for commit > > My understanding by reading the mails here and quick-reading the patch > (in my MUA, that's how quick the reading was), is that what you want > here is what's done in the patch, which has been proposed as a WIP, too.
It's not. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
