> Regarding JDBC in the CF process -- other interfaces are handled > there. I haven't seen one patch this size for JDBC since I've been > involved, let alone two competing patches to implement the same > feature. Small patches which can be quickly handled don't make sense > to put into the process, but it seemed reasonable for these.
In any way I'm sending this patch, and I will put this under Miscellaneous in CF. This cleared patch takes only 47k (in uncleared was some binary read classes) and about 50% it's big test case. Have a nice day, Radek
statemnt_to_20101014.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
