On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > >> Is this a JDBC patch or a PG patch? Are we tracking JDBC patches >> using the CF app? > > If this were the only patch for setQueryTimeout in front of us I > probably wouldn't have suggested that, but this thread started with a > patch proposal to implement the same JDBC feature through adding new > backend functions. Unless that patch is withdrawn or rejected, it > seems odd for two different groups to be simultaneously considering > patches to implement exactly the same functionality....
True. I thought we had decided on the client-side approach, but maybe I'm confused. I don't have a position one way or the other, just trying to understand the state of the conversation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
