On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > BTW, have we discussed the idea of embedding the role in the strategy > number? For example, require regular operators to have strategy > numbers 1-9999, while ordering operators have numbers 10000-19999, > leaving room for a couple more roles before we have to rethink the > assignment or widen amopstrategy to an int. That's a bit ugly but > might be better than adding a separate role column.
Yeah, we talked about it. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01075.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01079.php -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
