Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Relcache entries alone are not gonna work. There is way too much stuff
>> that assumes that tables are correctly represented in the system
>> catalogs.
> Well we're talking about multiple things now. In the global temporary
> table case they *are* properly represented in the system catalogs.
> Except for their local state such as the actual relfilenode all the
> structural attributes are going to be accurate.
... and relpages and reltuples ... it's really not going to be that easy
to have a table that isn't described in pg_class. Which the structure
you're describing isn't. There might be a template for it in pg_class,
but that's something entirely different.
> In the case of tables created locally on a slave, well, that's more
> complicated.
I think they're more alike than you think. If we had the infrastructure
to do local temp tables this way, it'd be pretty easy to use that to
instantiate per-backend copies of global temp tables. (The global
entities would be templates, not actual tables.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
