On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ... and as I recall, we got rid of it principally because the temp > tables weren't visible to ordinary catalog lookups, thus breaking > all sorts of client-side logic. >
Though that wouldn't be the case if the catalogs held a template..... Anyways I think this horse has been beaten to death. Whoever implements it will look at the pros and cons and decide which way they'll go. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
