"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires? Here's a > simple example:
I don't see what it buys us in this very context. The main thing here to realize is that I wrote about no code to parse the control file. I don't think the extension patch should depend on the JSON-in-core patch. Now, once we have JSON and before the release, I guess given a good reason to have much more complex configuration files that don't look at all like postgresql.conf, we could revisit. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
