Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 10/24/2010 07:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> Why do we need the is_trigger flag at all for the plperl hash key? At
>>> first glance it strikes me as unnecessary.
>> We might not. Does the presence or absence of the $_TD hash reference
>> have any impact on what we cache, or what Perl might cache internally?
> For both trigger and non-trigger functions, we compile this ahead of the
> user-set function code:
> our $_TD; local $_TD=shift;
> Non-trigger functions get passed "undef" to correspond to this invisible
> argument, while trigger functions get passed the hashref that the
> trigger calling code has set up.
Seems like we don't need it then. You going to get rid of it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
