Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of vie oct 22 17:02:22 -0300 2010: > Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie oct 22 16:21:14 -0300 2010:
> > I'll go rework the patch sometime later to drop the name from the > > control file, but that also means fixing several contrib modules by > > changing their file names, operation for which the project has no policy > > yet as far as I understand (we used CVS before). > > Change what file names? You lost me there. I thought the extension > name was going to be equal to the control file name, and said control > file doesn't exist yet, so you don't need to rename any existant file. > Am I confusing something? Hmm, after reading the latest blog post, it seems that the patch requires that the control file is equal to the .sql install script. Is this the case? I don't see a reason for this requirement; why not simply have a line for the install script in the control file? That way, you don't need to rename the .sql files. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
