> This is going to be dominated by constraint exclusion checking. There's > basically no fix for that except a more explicit representation of the > partitioning rules.
Damn, I knew that was going to be more complicated :) So in which case does this patch help? I guess in a multi-index scenario? childtables.sql is kind of hard to read (I think a FOR loop would have been more auto-explaining?). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
