Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie oct 29 12:54:52 -0300 2010: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > I tried the original test cases that were handed to me (quite different > > from what I submitted here) and they are fixed also. Thanks. > > It'd be interesting to know if there's any noticeable slowdown on > affected real-world cases. (Of course, if they invariably crashed > before, there might not be a way to measure their previous speed...) Yeah, the cases that were reported failed with one of ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 18446744073482534916 ERROR: could not open relation with OID 0 ERROR: buffer 228 is not owned by resource owner Portal -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
