On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > This thread died after me not implementing a new version and some potential > license problems. > > I still think its worthwile (and I used it in production for some time) so I > would like to implement a version fit for the next commitfest. > > The code where I started out from is under the zlib license - which is to my > knowledge compatible with PGs licence. Whats the position of HACKERS there? > There already is some separately licenced code around and were already linking > to zlib licenced code... > > For simplicitly I asked Mark Adler (the original Copyright Owner) if he would > be willing to relicence - he is not. > > For anybody not hording all old mail like me here is a link to the archives > about my old patch: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/201005202227.49990.and...@anarazel.de
IANAL, but the license doesn't appear incompatible to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
