On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 15:24, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote:
houldn't cache any of the setup but just redo it all every time.
>
> Huh?  I might try and argue that if the new test was more complex than
> 2 compares :P.  In-fact the way it stands now we uselessly grab the
> functions pg_proc entry in the common case.

This is bogus, I missed the fact that we need it to make sure the
function is uptodate for the OR REPLACE in CREATE OR REPLACE.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to