On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 15:24, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: houldn't cache any of the setup but just redo it all every time. > > Huh? I might try and argue that if the new test was more complex than > 2 compares :P. In-fact the way it stands now we uselessly grab the > functions pg_proc entry in the common case.
This is bogus, I missed the fact that we need it to make sure the function is uptodate for the OR REPLACE in CREATE OR REPLACE. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers