Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of lun nov 22 18:12:39 -0300 2010: > Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@gmail.com> writes: > > No. My suggestion was just to use the internal parser. > > What about something like the attached, cfparser.v3.patch?
the handling of relative vs absolute paths is bogus here. I think it'd make more sense to have a bool "are we including"; and if that's false and the path is not absolute, then the file is relative to CWD; or maybe we make it absolute by prepending PGDATA; maybe something else? (need to think of something that makes sense for both recovery.conf and extension control files) > If that looks ok, do we want to add some documentation about the new > lexer capabilities? beyond extra code comments? probably not. > Also, for what good reason would we want to prevent > people from using the include facility? Not sure about this -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
