On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric.villemain.deb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/23 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> ok, I can only recapitulate so this feature was proposed cca two
>>> months ago, and minimally Tom and maybe you did agreement - with
>>> request on syntax - do you remember? I am little bit tired so this
>>> agreement was changed when I spent my time with this.
>>
>> I went back and reread the thread I believe you're speaking about.
>> The first post is here:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01945.php
>
> Here perhaps ? (or before)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01983.php

Dang.  You're right.  I stand corrected.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to