2010/11/29 Robert Haas <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas <[email protected]>: >>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs >>>> (similar as on ORACLE). >>>> >>>> Is that good idea? >>> >>> I doubt it. Why would we want to do that? >> >> If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible >> to provide a fast DTD checking. > > But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a > system table. >
yes or now. If we have a some integrated rule for xml validation, but I can't to imagine a dependency on custom table. More - system table can be better cached. So it depends on level of integration to system. Probably it needs a deep discuss about SQL/XML and other questions. It can mean a not optional dependency on libxml2. Pavel > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
