2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2010/11/29 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: >>> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Tomáš Pospíšil <killt...@seznam.cz> wrote: >>>> I have idea of creating system table for holding DTDs, XSDs, Relax-NGs >>>> (similar as on ORACLE). >>>> >>>> Is that good idea? >>> >>> I doubt it. Why would we want to do that? >> >> If I understand, it allows a local copy of DTD, .. so then is possible >> to provide a fast DTD checking. > > But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a > system table. >
yes or now. If we have a some integrated rule for xml validation, but I can't to imagine a dependency on custom table. More - system table can be better cached. So it depends on level of integration to system. Probably it needs a deep discuss about SQL/XML and other questions. It can mean a not optional dependency on libxml2. Pavel > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
