On 11/29/2010 01:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> writes:
On 11/29/2010 12:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
But that could equally well be stored in a user table rather than a
system table.
Yeah. The trouble is you won't be able to use that reliably in a check
constraint, which I imagine is one of the principal intended purposes.
Moving the same data to a system table doesn't fix that, unless you
require that the system table be immutable ... which'd seem to make
the idea useless.
Oh, yes, I agree.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
