On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Rob Wultsch <wult...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Rob Wultsch <wult...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think you have read a bit more into what I have said than is >>> correct. MySQL can deal with thousands of users and separate schemas >>> on commodity hardware. There are many design decisions (some >>> questionable) that have made MySQL much better in a shared hosting >>> environment than pg and I don't know where the grants system falls >>> into that. >> >> Objection: Vague. > > I retract the remark, your honor.
Clarifying it would be fine, too... :-) > At some point Hackers should look at pg vs MySQL multi tenantry but it > is way tangential today. My understanding is that our schemas work like MySQL databases; and our databases are an even higher level of isolation. No? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
