On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I think this so-called two-step approach is pretty ugly. > > Well it does not need to be exposed to the user, thinking about it, as > proposed in the other thread. Other than that, you're argument here is > exactly the same as the ones saying that VACUUM or Hint Bints are > bad. It's just that if you want correctness, you don't have anything > better.
Exposing it to the user is what I think is ugly. It's also worth noting that ALTER EXTENSION .. SET SCHEMA does NOT guarantee a correct relocation, because someone might have done ALTER FUNCTION .. SET search_path = @extschema@, and that's not going to get properly fixed up. I'm coming to the conclusion more and more that ALTER EXTENSION .. SET SCHEMA just can't work reliably. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
