On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> But if it annoys you, it seems OK to change it. Don't see a reason to >> backpatch though? > > I think that It's worth backpatch to prevent users who observe the > occurrence of the query conflicts carefully for testing 9.0 from > getting confusing.
I don't think this is important enough to back-patch, but it does seem like a good idea in general, so committed, but just to the master branch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers