On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: > > What it does is gets rid of the incorrect completion which comes from > > the completion rule for "SET foo TO bar" by adding the correct > > completion for "SET SCHEMA" higher up in the completion function. > > > > So instead of an incorrect completion we get the correct one. > > But that's not necessarily wrong, if "foo" happens to be the name of a GUC.
Agreed, which is why I made the new rule only match ALTER x x SET SCHEMA while the rest will fall down and match SET . So I should be safe since SCHEMA is a reserved words. When I think of it I may even have be unnecessary to require the ALTER verb. Regards, Andreas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers