On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I agree with Robert that that is an utterly horrid, broken concept.
That's a little stronger than what I said, though the same general idea. > Just to point out one concrete problem: the postmaster reads > postgresql.conf too, so it would have to do this as well in order to > parse postgresql.conf correctly. This is an even more serious problem than what I was pointing out. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
