Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I like that better actually ... one less thing for developers to get wrong.
> The attached patch appears to work correctly on MacOS X. I did check,
> BTW: getppid() in the attached process returns gdb's pid. Poor!
Looks good to me.
> For my own purposes, I would be just as happy to apply this only to
> master. But I wonder if anyone wants to argue for back-patching, to
> help debug existing installations?
Given the lack of non-developer complaints, I see no need to backpatch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
