On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:13, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could we get away with something as simple as "requested operation is > not supported for <plural-form-of-object-type>"?
+1. If so, will we have a function to get object names something like GetPluralFormOfObjectType(Relation rel or char relkind) => char * ? > But that breaks our guideline about assembling > translatable strings from small pieces. Maybe it'd be OK if the piece > is just a fragment of SQL syntax, though - not sure. Agreed. <requested-operation> should be a SQL syntax, so we won't have to translate the part. -- Itagaki Takahiro -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
