Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun dic 27 12:54:16 -0300 2010: > On sön, 2010-12-26 at 12:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > We did clean up C++ keyword uses in the header files in 9.0, but your > > report shows it's already gotten broken again. I'm disinclined to fix > > it unless someone steps up to create an automated test that will get > > run reasonably often. We had that discussion when the patch to rename > > keyword-named fields was proposed, and nothing got done, and the > > current state of affairs is the entirely predictable result. > > src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck > > What's missing is to automate this, but it's unclear in what context, > and perhaps also to what extend this should be a hard requirement.
Maybe we could mention it in src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
