Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun dic 27 13:54:56 -0300 2010:

> [ lightbulb ] ... although we could improve that quite a bit if we
> processed each .h file separately instead of insisting on smashing
> everything into one compilation.  Let me go try that.

FWIW I have this patch lingering about that I wrote months ago, to check
for header problems (not C++ stuff, just things like forgetting to
include some necessary header in some other header).  Since it needs a
lot of polish (needs to ignore certain headers, and avoid leave
lingering files around), I didn't commit it; and I haven't updated it to
the new Make recursive stuff, either.  Maybe someone else knows what to
do with it, though.

*** a/src/include/Makefile
--- b/src/include/Makefile
*************** uninstall:
*** 60,65 ****
--- 60,72 ----
  # heuristic...
        rm -rf $(addprefix '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir_server)'/, $(SUBDIRS) *.h)
  
+ check:
+       for dir in $(SUBDIRS); do \
+               for header in `find $(srcdir)/$$dir -type f -name \*.h`; do \
+                       echo $$header; \
+                       $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -include postgres.h -o 
$$dir/`basename $$header .h`.gch $$header; \
+               done; \
+       done
  
  clean:
        rm -f utils/fmgroids.h parser/gram.h utils/probes.h catalog/schemapg.h

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to