On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:04, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: >>> Personally, my utility for the old repo is not much (if it was anything >>> important, I wouldn't have relied on the unofficial repo). But we should >>> probably give a little bit of warning for folks that might want to >>> rebase or translate some old notes. >> >> Well, I guess the question is how much warning. I suggested O(1 week) >> but Robert seems to want O(1 year). As long as there's some agreed >> deadline, I'm not very picky about what it is. > > I don't need to get rid of it *now*, but I agree a deadline is good. > > How about we either say "when 9.1 is released", or we say "september > 2011" because that's a year after we made the switch?
Either of those would be fine with me. Thanks! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
